Climate stories need to be accurate, well-sourced, and usually ready by early afternoon. But the evidence is scattered across thousands of studies, legislative documentation, raw data, news and public debate on social media. Checking it all with rigor takes time most newsrooms no longer have.
NEUROCLIMA Lens turns hours of digging into minutes. Search once and get research, EU legislation, news and public debate in one place, with the source linked next to every result. There’s also something few tools offer. Social Tipping Points shows where public concern is shifting, so you can spot the story before it becomes the headline.
Watch our short tutorial and get started.
Tested by journalists, in real conditions
Journalists and content creators in Belgium, Portugal, Greece and Cyprus have already put Lens through its paces in NEUROCLIMA pilot workshops. In Belgium, Greece and Cyprus, participants took on a question any editor might assign: Is climate change impacting food security in Europe? They used Lens to gather the evidence, data and sources for a feature, then turned their findings into a pitch.
What mattered most to them was trust. They valued seeing exactly where each piece of information came from. For several of them, this set Lens apart from general-purpose AI assistants and meant less time spent fact-checking. “The reliability of the sources is the most important thing,” one participant said. Another said the tools “save us a lot of time and strengthen our credibility.” Disinformation is spreading, budgets are shrinking and specialist reporters are fewer, so speed combined with sourcing you can verify matters more than ever. Feedback from these pilots is shaping how Lens evolves.
Part of the NEUROCLIMA Hub, Lens is especially useful for reporters, editors and content creators covering climate. Watch our short tutorial, then put Lens to the test yourself in the NEUROCLIMA Hub.
